Turning History Around:
a man we ought to know

by G.S.    george.salzman@umb.edu, 19 September 2007

this page is at http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/S2/2007-09-19.htm

      Fact is, there are many good people we ought to know. Mazin Qumsiyeh is one of them. Every day I get notes from some of them suggesting things to read. And lots of the suggestions are excellent, though there are too many to pass on to my own list. I would end up spending all my time compiling reading lists, and be unable to do the other things I would like to believe are important. So it’s always a matter of selection, and good stuff gets omitted. Mazin Qumsiyeh is a real powerhouse. Here’s his latest.
================================================
Subject: [HumanRights] Hasbara and Hafrada
From: Mazin Qumsiyeh <qumsi001@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:25:01 -0400

Hasbara and Hafrada
(Israeli Hebrew words for propaganda and separation)

Up until now, while leading Democratic and Republican elites debate “managing” Iraqi lives (orientalist racism at its worst), some 4% of Iraqis were killed and 17% made refugees/internally displaced in the past four years. This would be equivalent to killing 12 million and displacing over 50 million US citizens. I discussed elsewhere the role of the Israel lobby in pushing for the war on Iraq[1].

This lobby represented by the Israel Hasbara (propaganda) Committee is now fretting about Jewish intermarriage and lack of identification with Zionism or the state of Israel [2]. As someone who is “intermarried”, I ask what is wrong with assimilation and intermarriage?  This reminded me that Yaakov Herzog, close advisor to four Israeli Prime Ministers, wrote: “We are not a normal people, we are not free from the Galut (exile) burden and we are not accepted by the world ... Political Zionism maintained that the concept of ‘people who dwell alone’ is, in fact, an abnormal condition. In reality, the concept of ‘people who dwell alone’ is the natural condition of the Jewish people.” [3].  He was wrong in characterizing political Zionism because most political Zionists believed in segregation and that was the whole idea of a “Jewish State”. He is also wrong to blame the whole world for the Zionist tribalistic mentality which exists out of its own desires to be separate and treat any non-Jew with contempt.  It is the same idea that lets Zionists express that the world is always “against us” and privately claim to each other that any support they get is because of their might and muscle. Howard Friedman, President of AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee], titled his letter of July 30, 2006 to friends and supporters of AIPAC “Look what you've done”. He explained: “Israel is fighting a pivotal war for its life ... the expected chorus of international condemnation of Israel’s actions ... only ONE nation in the world came out and flatly declared: Let Israel finish the job ... That nation is the United States of America -- and the reason it had such a clear, unambiguous view of the situation is YOU and the rest of America Jewry ... How do we do it? ... decades of long hard work which never ends.”
 
Whether Jewish or not, if you are human and are concerned with human rights, you would reject ideas of segregation/separation (Hafrada in Hebrew) and adopt ideas of coexistence, assimilation, and justice. To do that you would recognize things being shielded by censorship (from actions of Zionists in many media outlets). Here are just some recent news items and relevant writing on the subject of the Israel lobby and censorship.
 
1. A chair of a history department writes on the attempts to use the card of anti-semitism to silence debate on his campus.  He titles his article: “On Being Called An Anti-Semite in Montana: Is booking a critic of the Israel lobby to speak on your campus anti-Semitic?”.  Prof. Richard Drake concludes: “In a democratic society, all government policies must stand for public inspection. This is true whether liberal Democrats or conservative Republicans are in charge. With both of our political parties and the media sharing the same basic ideas about foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, we need a place where the assumptions of the status quo encounter a stern testing, not a happy-faced tribute. The university should be that place” [4]
 
2. Mrs. Clinton wants to get Jewish votes and money and to do that, she thinks she has to court the right-wing fascist elements of the Zionist movement.  So she emphasizes her strong support of apartheid Israel: “Hillary Clinton believes that Israel’s right to exist in safety as a Jewish state, with defensible borders and an undivided Jerusalem as its capital, secure from violence and terrorism, must never be questioned.” I urge everyone to write to remind her that Jerusalem is illegally occupied and that no state has a right to be Jewish (or Muslim or Christian). Human rights demand that states be states of the citizens who live in them regardless of their religion.
 
3. George Bisharat explains that there is “A double standard on academic freedom in the Middle East” and how the lobby tries to silence debate in Academia [5]
 
4. Dick Cheney, who was and may still be a board member of the “Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs”, is pushing for a war on Iran just like he and [Paul D.] Wolfowitz and [Richard N.] Perle and [Douglas J.] Feith and [Michael A.] Ledeen and other neocon Zionists pushed for a war on Iraq (See [6]). Ledeen just published a book vilifying Iran.
 
5. A gentlemen was asking questions of Senator Kerry and was tackled, attacked and tasered by police.  The media did not tell you that he spoke only for 1 minute 20 seconds of his allotted 2 minute time.  They also did not tell you that only when he asked if Kerry was a member of the secret Skull and Bones Society [of Yale University] that he was tackled. The video is posted here: http://www.attytood.com/ (continued segment where he asks police not to taser him is here http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=5692). They were worried where he might be going with a line of questioning that started with the fact that Kerry let Bush steal the 2004 elections. Here is what Bush said at the AIPAC convention just before the Bush-vs-Kerry election (talks made while Israel was committing war crimes and crimes against humanity):
“The United States is strongly committed, and I am strongly committed, to the security of Israel as a vibrant Jewish state ... Israel is a democracy and a friend and has every right to defend itself from terror.” Kerry said exactly the same at AIPAC, and here is what Joe Lieberman said of Kerry: “John Kerry has always stood with our crucial ally, Israel. During his 20-year Senate career, John has compiled a perfect record of pro-Israel votes, through his votes on economic aid, military security and the location of the U.S. Embassy. And John Kerry has had the courage to face down leaders who promote anti-Semitism. He has flown with the Israeli Air Force and seen from the cockpit how vulnerable Israel is. Simply put, Israel can rely on John Kerry.”
 
6. “The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations” is pushing for Iran confrontation just like they did with the Iraq confrontation before 2003 [7].
 
7. Congressman [Jom] Moran is being targeted by the Israel Lobby for speaking the truth.  The Washington Post titled an article “Moran Upsets Jewish Groups Again: U.S. House Democrat Said Pro-Israel Lobby Promoted War”. He was attacked by the Lobby but defended by Rabbi Lener of Tikkun. Moran stood his grounds stating “I think Mr. Halber is being disingenuous in suggesting that the AIPAC board has not been strongly supportive of military involvement in Iraq and now in Iran” [8].
 
The 19th century notions of oppression, separation, and the use of propaganda to hide the facts led to atrocities of WWI, WWII, and many others.  It has no place in the 21st century.
 
References:
[1] http://www.qumsiyeh.org/connectingthedotsiraqpalestine/
[2] http://www.infoisrael.net/cgi-local/text.pl?source=4/b/viii/120320072
[3] Yaakov Herzog, “Am Levadad Yishkon-A People Who Dwells Alone-“ Tel-Aviv: Sifriat Maariv, 1975, pp. 58-59, Cited in Middle East Journal M Volume 61, No.1, Winter 2007
[4] http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2007/SO/Feat/Drak.htm
[5] http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.boycott17sep17,0,447
6313.story

[6] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/16/wiran1
16.xml

[7] http://www.conferenceofpresidents.org/
[8] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/14/AR200709
1402171.html

__________________________________

Mailing List Instructions: This low quantity mailing list (Maximum 2-3 messages per week, usually one to two per week) is intended to advance understanding in areas little exposed in mainstream media, and to foster positive action for peace. It is easy to unsubscribe from the list by either emailing me back (write “unsubscribe” in the subject heading) OR you can unsubscribe yourself directly by sending a blank message to <wheelsofjustice-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net> .

If you know others who might be interested to join the list, please ask them to subscribe by sending a blank message to <wheelsofjustice-subscribe@lists.riseup.net>

================================================
All comments and criticisms are welcome.  <george.salzman@umb.edu>

If you want to be off my e-mail list, please let me know.
If you want to be added, please write me with
your full name and e-mail address

*      *      *
Return to the Latest postings page
Return to the opening page of the Website

Last update of this page: 19 September 2007