A new friend, David Baillie - 3

by <georgeisalzman@yahoo.com>  2010-07-19

URL: http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-07-19.htm

      David pointed out that to label him with the adjective Nazi, as I earlier did, was pejorative — it denigrated him in the eyes of many, probably most, of the readers. He doesn’t consider it an appropriate characterization. The fact is that he’s right about that, which led me to “explain” my motivation as being only a promo-

Palestina somos todos — We are all Palestine. Aug 28,
2009 foto of G.S. by Nancy Davies

tional gimmick, to grab peoples’ attention. Mainly I was trying to gain readership, and engagement in the real struggle to save the earth and all living species. But David was right, and I’m dropping it.
[Note. This replies to David Baillie’s note datelined Tue,
13 Jul 2010 21:48:44 -0400 on the previous post.]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>
To: David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>
CC: George Salzman <george.salzman@umb.edu>, Orrin Judd <orrin@brothersjudd.com>, Mazin Qumsiyeh <mazin@qumsiyeh.org>, William Blum <bblum6@aol.com>, Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>, David Sketchley <davidsketchley@gmail.com>, Nancy Davies <nmsdavies@gmail.com>

      David, Hungarians and Romanians are not Slavs, although there are Slavic minorities in each country. For that matter, not all Czechs are Slavs either, with significant German minority. And to pin the blame for the loss of Stalingrad on the Romanian and Hungarian divisions is simply not valid, nor endorsed by any historian that I am aware of.

      Stalingrad is considered by many historians the turning point of the Second World War, the way Midway is considered the pivotal battle of the pacific war. The Germans threw everything they could muster at Stalingrad and came up short. That is the fact. The Soviet Army launched Operation Uranus on 19 November 1942 and broke through the Romanian Northern Flank. The German strategy was for the non-German divisions to defensively hold the flanks, while the German Panzer divisions spearheaded offensive operations into Stalingrad and the Caucasus. Additionally, the non-German divisions were poorly equipped. The Romanians relied on Czech-built Panzer tanks with a small 37 mm gun that was not effective against Soviet armor. For that matter, even the Germans’ best Panzers were outgunned and outclassed by the Soviet T-34, widely regarded as the best tank of the war.

      The Soviets quickly encircled the entire German Sixth Army, but instead of trying to break out, Hitler ordered them to stay put. So strategic mistake upon strategic mistake. The Germans overreached and were crushed. Anyway, a quick look at the numbers tells the story. The total Axis strength in the Battle of Stalingrad was just over 1.1 million. Of those, only 134,000 were Romanians, comprising the third and fourth Romanian armies. The Hungarians, Italians and Croats were there in smaller number, so overall the foreign component was less than 20 percent. The Soviets also had just over a million troops in the battle but more artillery by half, and nearly double the tanks and aircraft.

      Anyway, my point in writing is to say that your white supremacist leanings are quite obvious. You may not call it that, but I think you would agree if I said that white people are under attack from the non-whites of the world. I think you would agree if I said that white people are getting a raw deal and are taking too much blame. The Holocaust being one of those things where the blame is excessive. Now I will just say that I don’t think anyone here agrees with any of that. I personally, although of the caucasian race, am quite aware that white European hegemony and conquest for the last half millennium is a crime spree that has never been equaled in history. I have no sympathy for the so-called white race whatsoever because it has been taking and stealing and trampling people the world over without mercy or conscience.

      Anything bad that happens to the white race from here on in is truly just desserts. And nothing bad has even started happening yet. The “poor white man” refrain coming from skinheads and nazis is ridiculous. They are peeved that they no longer enjoy the blatant overt prejudice and bigotry that characterized US (and Anglo-Saxon culture generally) in the past. As far as Israel and Jews are concerned, I am not Jewish, but I did lose many relatives (non-Jews) in the Holocaust. I find it sickening that people who know nothing about this from first-hand experience try to minimize this event by rewriting history. At the same time, I do agree that the Jewish-run media has been disgraceful in turning the Holocaust tragedy into a pro-colonialist agenda for Israel. They also have turned their backs on all the non-Jewish victims, as well as the victims of other genocides, like the Armenians.

      Having said that, there are a great many Jews who are fighting on the right side, including right here in this discussion. I grew up in heavily Jewish north Toronto and every Jew I have known has been a good person. These are just ordinary people like you and me. Only a tiny few are super wealthy and part of the elite. The rest are doing the best they can with the information they are given. Unfortunately this information is the same stream of lies that we are all fed. The ordinary Jew is no worse than the ordinary Wasp for believing a lot of things that happen to be wrong. The white supremacists are against all Jews, including the ordinary people. This is just plain wrong. Regards, Gordon Arnaut, Oro-Medonte Township, Ontario.


Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:04:31 -0500
From: George Salzman <george.salzman@umb.edu>

      Friends, I think you can see from his response to David Baillie why I so highly prize Gordon’s friendship and trust. I have been working on a new post to my website which I will put up (in it’s yet-to-be-completed form) as soon after sending this note as I can. It is headed, A new Nazi friend, David Baillie - 2, . . . at http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-07-14.htm where you can see it. I omitted Liz Burbank from the recipients of this message, since she asked to be cut out. I wish she had not left. I will comment about her lengthy piece and her dumping on David, markedly contrasting with Gordon’s comments. By the way David, my copy of Mein Kampf is the translation by Ralph Manheim, published in 1943 by Houghton Mifflin Company, which apparently bought the right to use Manheim’s translation of the 1925 German edition put out by Verlag Frz. Eher Nachf, G.M.B.H. If you are acquainted with this translation I would be very interested to know your thoughts about its quality.

      Gordon, I will not add your response to David in the posting I’m about to put up, but will use it as the initial item in yet another posting, A new ‘Nazi’ friend, David Baillie – 3. I know you're a “woodsman”, Gordon, so you’ll appreciate a picture of a local woman here that I photographed one day gathering firewood for cooking, taken on the hill that I climb almost daily. It's in the essay at http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-05-24.htm . Just scroll down a bit. She and several others of her family are there almost every day, usually three or four women and a few very small children, and some days a man. The humble people on whom the world depends. Sincerely, and my thanks to those of you who participated, —George


Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:11:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeffrey Blankfort <jablankfort@earthlink.net>

      George, Yesterday, I had several private exchanges with David Baillie who is a proud Nazi, a proud racist, and a proud white supremacist. I am not sure how he managed to get into this small list but it is clear, to me at least, that he has contaminated it. My hatred of racist Zionists — and I have no problem in admitting that it is nothing other than hatred — is not greater than what I have for Nazis and I am not interested in arguing with or convincing such human vermin — and again I use that term deliberately — of the error of their thinking because experience shows that doesn’t work. So, please, if you choose to keep him on your list, please take me off it. Reading his rants only raises my blood pressure. This is a case of the enemy of my enemy not being my friend. —Jeff


Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:50:55 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Thanks for the introduction George. *blush* I'll respond to the silly Hungarians not being Slavs when I get a chance. I am curious about this recent article by the JTA [Jewish Telegraphic Agency] as it raises a very old topic:

=================================
U.S. lawmakers seek action against campus anti-Semitism, July 13, 2010

      WASHINGTON (JTA) -- U.S. Congress members of Congress signed a letter expressing concern about how the federal Department of Education is responding to anti-Semitism on college campuses. The Zionist Organization of America ZOA) lobbied for the letter, which was signed by 36 lawmakers and sent last week to Department of Education secretary Arne Duncan. The letter raised questions about the department’s Office for Civil Rights’ enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
      In 2004 ZOA requested that the civil rights’ office investigate anti-Semitic incidents at the University of California, Irvine. In 2007, after looking into the allegations, the office concluded that it could not take action because the incidents were not based on students’ national origins. The lawmakers’ letter denounced this decision, saying that the Office for Civil Rights was not abiding by its own policy statement. The office’s policy statement says that it will enforce Title VI for groups that exhibit both racial and ethnic characteristics, such as Jews. Title VI ensures that recipients of federal funding, including public and most private universities, keep their programming free from racial and ethnic discrimination.

      University of California President Mark Yudof said the ZOA’s claims were exaggerated. “[I will] do everything in my power to protect Jewish and all other students from threats or actions of intolerance,” he said in a July 6 statement. The letter was written following a briefing for congressional staff about anti-Semitism on college campuses organized by Rep. Ron Klein (D-Fla.), co-chairman of the Congressional Task Force on Anti-Semitism. Speakers at the briefing included representatives from ZOA, The American Jewish Committee and Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life.

=================================
      So please a straightforward answer is merited, are Jews religious adherents or a race?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:36:10 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Hi George, I would hate to be the cause of rancor within your little cabal of Communists. I also refute the notion that I am a “racist”. I have nothing against other races as such. In fact, I dated a black girl. I am a Nationalist and I believe that the races should by and large be separated for their mutual benefit. I do find it interesting that for all of the “brains” here I have barely gotten any thought out discussion or answers to my own questions, only emotional outbursts based on preconceived notions. If you folks think that YOU are going to solve the world’s problems or just the US’s problems I think you should re-evaluate what it is you want and how you are going to get there.

      In addition, I do believe I have posted articles from Counterpunch on my own site in the past and it is one of my bookmarks, however, I will no longer bother going to or using any of the articles there knowing that hypocrites contribute to the site. You may feel free to keep me on your list or not. I will not respond in the future, but I do find it interesting to “see how the other half lives”.


Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>

      Hi George, Thanks for the kind words. I was reluctant to wade in because I had a similar scrap with skinheads on Shamir’s list. But these troglodytes do know how to push my buttons. Thanks for that picture of the woman gathering wood. That’s going to be me in a couple of months. Looking at that gal I almost feel guilty about having a chainsaw and tractor. There are few things as satisfying as working with nature — tilling the soil, working in the woods, the farmyard with the animals. But it’s not all sweetness and light. A few weeks ago I had to do something that pained me greatly. A raptor had been killing my chicks for a few years now. Always the same one, a beautiful Chicken Hawk with a blue belly like a Blue Jay and tawny gray wings. Last fall he killed my brand new rooster on his very first day here on the farm. I was devastated.

      My policy is always to scare them away by firing a few rounds “across the bow.” That usually scares them enough that they don’t come back for a good long time. But this guy had gotten used to it, it seems. A few minutes later he was back to finish his meal. Several more warning shots only served to shoo him to a tree a safe distance away. I knew that I must kill him, or else he would be back tomorrow and kill another one of my chicks. Now you have to understand that I have grown very fond of these chicks. They will literally let me pat them on the tail feathers when they are sitting on their roost in the evening. They run up to me whenever I approach the chicken yard, knowing that I usually have delicious table scraps. I can pick one up like I would pick up one of the kitties. By the way, chickens really love chicken ... I know that sounds terrible, but they love any kind of meat and I don’t think they give it a second thought what kind it is. I often open a tin of tuna for them and they are on it like piranhas. The rooster — what a chivalrous creature he is — will not take a single speck for himself. I used to try to put a piece down in front of him, but he always calls his chicks over right away and genuflects to the ground to point out the piece with his beak, which the chick grabs right away.

      Only after the chicks have eaten everything up and moved on will he scour the area for any tiny little crumbs that are left over. When I drive my tractor and cut the grass in the hay field, I let the chicks follow because the bugs are a-poppin’ and they have a feast. Whenever the rooster catches a big grasshopper he holds it in his beak and calls out to his chicks, one of which will run over and take it from his beak. And people say chickens are stupid. George, people could learn a lot from these little birds. A friend of mine whose sons I grew up with, told me once how times were tough back in the day and her husband would go to his parents’ farm to get a care package for the family. They would pack up for him a roasted chicken, a loaf of bread, a stick of butter — all of it homemade on the farm, and he’d get on his motorcycle and ride home. When he got home he would sit down and eat every single scrap by himself, while his wife and two infant sons looked on. When his wife asked him why he did not give the boys any, he replied that meat was not good for kids. Every day when I see my rooster holding up a piece of meat or a bug for one of his chicks I think of that story. So it was with great sadness that I had to dispatch this magnificent flying predator. I plucked a couple of his long, magnificent tailfeathers and kept one — and gave the other to a guitar-playing friend who likes to wear a cowboy hat. I left both the dead chick and hawk out in the field for the scavengers and mostly they were cleaned up by the next day. Such is life. It is not meant to be easy, but it can sure be poignant. Best Regards, —Gordon.


Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:08:30 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: Jeffrey Blankfort <jablankfort@earthlink.net>

      George, please take me off of this list as I asked you before. The notion of having a “Nazi friend,” or even seeing those two words combined, as someone with whom you and others are exchanging “friendly”communications is, frankly, nauseating and while it may not be a problem for you, it is for me. I am no more interested in having this creature’s racist garbage in my email box than I am with those of his modern Jewish counterparts although some of the latter I find politically useful. What use you, can make of a modern day Nazi I cannot imagine nor am I interested, frankly, in finding out. So please take me off this list. Otherwise, I’ll just tell my computer to block out all further communications from this thread. Thank you! —Jeff


Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:24:31 +0200
From: David Sketchley <davidsketchley@gmail.com>

      Dear George, I have to agree with Jeffrey. The words Nazi and friend just don’t go together. Best wishes —David Sketchley


Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:39:08 -0500

      Hi David, I know the combination Nazi and friend doesn’t feel comfortable to our “Allied” ears, but that’s the idea, to get people to wonder why they’re irritatingly juxtaposed, to get their attention. Hopefully to take a first look at what I’m up to. All the best, —George


Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:52:26 +0200
From: Mazin Qumsiyeh

      Gentlemen, I never asked to be on this list. I do not know why I was put in the cc to begin with. Please remove my email from any replies. I have already far too many emails received. Thank you —Mazin


Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:47:10 -0500
From: George Salzman <george.salzman@umb.edu>
CC: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>
Subject: Our correspondence, from first to today

Oaxaca, Mexico, Friday 16 July 2010
      Hi David, You began our contact on 28 June, two and a half weeks ago, and continued with a number of e-mails until yesterday. In three notes you mentioned things still to be done. In this note I've enlarged in boldface those three quotes. On 11 July you said we "should have a sit down some time and discuss this whole US imperialism/Zionist/Leftist hyper-Capitalism thing someday soon. It wasn't clear what you had in mind, because I'm living here in Oaxaca, a few thousand miles from Massachusetts, your stamping ground. I intended to invite you to visit here if you can manage to make the trip. I just didn't get around to it under the pressure of trying to stay on top of the disputes. If you do, say for about a week, I'll take care of getting a place in a youth hostel in the neighborhood for you to stay at and will help somewhat with the food costs. Of course the major cost is travel. It would give you an opportunity to experience the indigenous people here, and to witness a culture that is far more humane than the so-called Western culture of American Whites. A lot of what you wrote is surely correct, as is also true of Mein Kampf, but much is totally off the wall. We hold contradictory ideologies. I'm ready to hold my ground, convinced that in my life so far I've managed to learn a lot, not enough of course. In fact I am a humble person, with no illusions that I'm any great shakes, but I also have no shame of what I am. My impression is that you are on pretty shaky ground, and you are unwilling to admit it to yourself, thinking that to admit being mistaken would lessen you in the eyes of other people. It's noticeable that Gordon's refutation of your pseudo-facts didn't get your typical shotgun response. This guy is solid as a rock -- practically his entire immediate family was killed by Croatian Nazis -- and yet he is still very much in love with life. At any rate, I'm hoping you'll find the intellectual courage to continue the interchange. My assumption is that every human being is a full person -- there's no such thing as untermenschen", and we ought to all treat one another with respect. Sincerely, with good wishes, --George

===========================
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:20:10 -0400
Subject: I heard about you from a friend
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Hi George, I heard about you from a friend of mine. I am interested in who you think is running the show in this country, what their objectives are and how you suppose your Liberal anarchist revolution would change things. Thanks, Editor, editor@nemw.net

===========================
Letter to a new Nazi friend in Massachusetts
and his immediate response

Date: Thursday, 01 July 2010 11:05 a.m.
Note 6. G.S to David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>

      Hello David, The last time I tried having a serious conversation with a Nazi was with my “kid” brother, who just turned 80 this June 10th.
===========================
Subject: Re: "Nazi, Schmazi" says Werner von Braun
From: Editor <editor@nemw.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:48:11 -0400
To: George Salzman <george.salzman@umb.edu>

      When I have time, I will gladly respond point by point   .  .

===========================
Subject: "Survivors" wants answers from Kagan - Does it ever end?
From: Editor (David Baillie) <editor@nemw.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:29:21 -0400

Israel delende est!

      One must wonder just WHY SCOTUS would have ANYTHING to do with Hoax con artists in Italy. It is one thing when politicians have used their bully pulpit to strong arm the Swiss, the French, the Swedes, the Swiss again, etc (it goes without saying that as long as there are Jews in the world the Germans will be bled endlessly for the HOAX) to steal money for the Jews, it is quite another for the ultimate LAW of OUR land to get involved with this EXTORTION. These creatures got what they wanted, another kike dike bulldog (like Madeleine Albright) to do their dirty work. This is no doubt one of the reasons they were clamoring to get her in when that other piece of trash Sotomayor was being considered .  .  .
===========================
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:44:38 -0400
Subject: Re: The Judaization of American discourse - beginning to be challenged
From: David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>

  .  .  I think you and I should have a sit down some time and discuss this whole US imperialism/Zionist/Leftist hyper-Capitalism thing someday soon   .  .

===========================
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:09:44 -0400
From: David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>


  .  .  Liz dear, why don’t you take a look at who runs the media, or that big-assed Menorah on the White House lawn at CHRISTMAS. Or the Supreme Court, or AIPAC, on and on and on . . . For a mere 2 - 3 percent, Jews are awfully conspicuous as a cultural factor.    .
===========================
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:52:22 -0400
From: David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>
To: Jeffrey Blankfort <jablankfort@earthlink.net>

 
     Sorry JF, but Nazis and Zionists are only similar as far as racial purity are concerned and in the case of the Germans, they had a virtually pure racial stock they wished to preserve in a homeland that they wished to protect. The “Allies” in destroying Germany made sure they screwed that up for them and the rest of us White folks while they were at it .  .  .
===========================
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:48:44 -0400
From: David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>
To: Jeffrey Blankfort <jablankfort@earthlink.net>

 
     You are a Kool Aid drinker. I am half Czech, that’s Slavic, duh. You should really put down the tripe propaganda crap and read some real history. Hitler NEVER called anyone “sub-human”.  .  .
===========================
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:50:55 -0400
Subject: Re: My reply to Liz Burbank's criticism that I confounded 'Jewish' and
'Zionist'
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>
To: George Salzman <george.salzman@umb.edu>
CC: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>, Orrin Judd
<orrin@brothersjudd.com>, Mazin Qumsiyeh <mazin@qumsiyeh.org>, William Blum <bblum6@aol.com>, David Sketchley <davidsketchley@gmail.com>, Nancy Davies <nmsdavies@gmail.com>, Jeffrey Blankfort <jablankfort@earthlink.net>

      Thanks for the introduction George. *blush*
I'll respond to the silly Hungarians not being Slavs when I get a chance.
I am curious about this recent article by the JTA [Jewish Telegraph Agency] as it raises a very old topic: U.S. lawmakers seek action against campus anti-Semitism, July 13, 2010 .  .  .
===========================
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:36:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Thursday morning update from George
CC: [same as previous plus] Liz Burbank <lizburbank@speakeasy.net>

      Hi George, I would hate to be the cause of rancor within your little cabal of Communists. I also refute the notion that I am a "racist". I have nothing against other races as such. In fact, I dated a black girl. I am a Nationalist and I believe that the races should by and large be separated for their mutual benefit.
      I do find it interesting that for all of the "brains" here I have barely gotten any thought out discussion or answers to my own questions, only emotional outbursts based on preconceived notions. If you folks think that YOU are going to solve the world's problems or just the US's problems I think you should re-evaluate what it is you want and how you are going to get there. In addition, I do believe I have posted articles from <i>Counterpunch</i> on my own site in the past and it is one of my bookmarks, however, I will no longer bother going to or using any of the articles there knowing that hypocrites contribute to the site.
      You may feel free to keep me on your list or not. I will not respond in the future, but I do find it interesting to "see how the other half lives".
Date:From: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>

      Hi George, I just want to say I think you are doing the right thing. You took a few shots from people who got a bit hot under the collar that we have someone in our discussion with opposing views. Well, if you are just going to hang around with those who have the same views then what can come of that? About David — I read some of his website, including that letter to Debra Sweet, which I found very agreeable. He speaks against capitalism, the lie of 9/11, the wrong and pointless wars of aggression, and the big lie of supposed change from Obama. All of these things are spot on.

      I also know enough about Hitler and National Socialism to say without doubt that he was a man of the people — and genuinely cared that they get a fair shake. The “socialism” component was very real. We here in the West today, especially the US, have far fewer real rights — we are nothing but feudal serfs for the corporate class who own this society lock stock and barrel and inflict a system so devoid of social justice that its tyranny has probably never been matched in history.

      I do not agree with David’s “poor white man” ideology, nor the paranoid idea that the Jews have hijacked Western civilization and are to blame for all the problems. That is a very shallow and unserious reading of history. For example, where were the Jews in the heyday of the British Empire, which was the direct forerunner of the US Empire that co-opted it? Where were the Jews in the colonization of the Americas and the biggest genocide and land theft ever? Where were they in the colonization of Africa, Asia, etc? It is ridiculous. It is only in the last century that a Jewish “influence,” if you can call it that, begins to emerge. Now to be honest, the Jewish influence, which started in the intellectual arena — Marx, Engels, Einstein, etc. — has grown to encompass the political arena in a very real way. In history we see that in the Roman Empire the Greeks, a more ancient and learned people (like the Jews), occupied a similar slot. In time, as Roman power shifted to the East, the Greeks actually took over politically (Byzantium).

      One could argue that something similar is happening here. I used to be dead against the idea of the Israeli tail wagging the US dog, but I’m not so sure any more. But my point is that the ascendance of Jewish influence is a very recent thing. You cannot take this outside the context of 400 years of white (and predominantly Anglosphere) colonialism and imperialism which is the foundation of our current order.

      Now a final point about Hitler and demonization of historical figures. The same kind of indoctrination is used here to make Stalin a monster equal to Hitler, if not worse. This neglects the reality that Stalin too was a man of the people. Today we suffer as never before under the yoke of the banks and others of the rentier class who are parasites on the body of society. The same was true in Russia until Stalin very clinically excised this cancer. (Honest economists who know and value history — like Professor Hudson — will tell you what a useful and necessary operation this was; in fact if this purging of the financial parasites had not been accomplished, it is doubtful that Russia could have prepared for the German onslaught).

      This indoctrination and faux history that is being foisted upon the unwary sheeple of the West is very dangerous. In Russia, which bore the brunt of the struggle against Nazism, there is no such demonization of Hitler as a historical figure. The Nazi ideology is despised, yes, but historical figures are not turned into caricatures. Stalin of course is revered as a national savior, which is true and proper. It is only here in our society of feudal lords and people kept in eternal darkness and ignorance that such fantastic tales are spun out of thin air. David and others in his movement recognize this as much as we do and react likewise with revulsion. In that we have much common ground. Regards, —Gordon.


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:37:44 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Thank you Gordon, and thank you, George. To start, I am a mutt, Czech, Ukrainian, Scottish and Native American. You need not tell me about the British Empire, as a Scot I am well aware. Or the Communists, I am well aware of what they really did as well. Some day I will tell you what my grandmother endured with two small children in post-war Prague. Another clarification, I do not call myself a “Nazi”, it is NOT what National Socialists call themselves, not even the German ones. It is a derogatory term used by the Allies (to confuse people as to Zionism? Zionism/Nazism, most people are not equipped to handle subtle differences such as this, let alone semantic distortions. Nazi is a pejorative term which as you saw yourself creates a barrier to discussion.

      I never did cry about the “poor White man”. George, you wrote the other day of having an “indigenous” approach. Today I am the “indigenous” man. I AM concerned that the neighborhood I grew up in is now overrun with Brazilian squatters. I grew up in a city of mainly Irish and Italian folks that worked hard and maintained their properties. It is gone. My parents now live on a street where the most well-kept garden two houses up now serves as a parking lot for 5 cars and a boat. As a contractor I recently worked for a Jewish slum lord who owns 6 disgustingly squalid tenement buildings in which she has allowed illegals. They willingly signed a lease saying they would move in with the apartments as is. Then they, en masse, started “playing the system” and stopped paying rent as well as living on the dole. One day the owner and I got to talking and she said that she was “rethinking” her Liberal-mindedness. I think both sides are in the wrong. Her for expecting people to live in filth (walls filled with mildew that are painted over, and they for coming here and living off the rest of us, etc.

      I will add one more wrinkle to that story. Not all of those apartments have squatters. There is a hard working White family in one apartment that have had to pull teeth to get anything fixed, and a gentle old Jewish man (maybe gay, he has never been married) who has lived in his for over 30 years. In all that time, his landlord (the husband of the Jewish woman, he died recently) has never even painted the apartment. Last winter a leak in the ceiling over his pantry got so bad that water poured in and destroyed the pantry. The slum lord sent me to seal the roof (a flat tar and gravel) but the pantry has been left destroyed to this day as far as I know. Mr. Gluck (the elderly Jewish man) has always payed his rent and is AFRAID to complain because she may raise his rent. I pressed him to go to the Board of Health, like the illegals, but given his nature I doubt he has done so. Instead of putting money back into the property, the owners have lived the good life. The son refinanced all of these slum buildings to purchase a country club in Nashua, NH. Below is a picture of one of Mr. Gluck’s ceilings, they are all like this:

      As to your other topics. Who is in charge is academic. Is it Jews? There are most certainly Jewish elites involved, those euphemistically referred to as the “bankers” and media controllers. I choose the Nazi symbol instead of the Hammer and Sickle because I do not appreciate the average “good” Jews’ Liberalism either, which is destabilizing my “indigenous” homeland, it does seem to be a problem anywhere Jews get hold politically and socially. You may not see it that way, I do. I think that Jews stick together and are ruled from on high like a cult, their “persecutions” used to flock them like sheep towards the aims of their more rabid Talmudic leaders. In my estimation, this, inadvertently or not, on the part of the average Jew, creates a Fifth Column in the homelands of indigenous peoples. Witness Liz’s rabid anti-White man ranting. Are White men indigenous anywhere? Don’t we have some rights somewhere, why must we be colonized by outsiders? I was driven from the high tech industry (outsourced or H1B1 here) and when I went back to contracting found that illegals are being paid dirt money by, yes, Whites — contractors to gobble up all the work they can get, thereby reducing the jobs available for the rest of us. A curse on these White folks as well.

      South Africa and Rhodesia fed much of Africa thanks to the White farmers. Africa as a whole is further in jeopardy because White man gave up his station as the arbiter of civilization and control there. All because Whites did NOT want to mix with blacks? Mandela was imprisoned, not executed by the Whites, while his wife was necklessing her opponents. These two countries became nations because White men made nations of them while many tribes fought each other endlessly.

      The same is true of the US. I am part Indian, I understand the conquest from both sides, however this is now a unified nation BECAUSE of the White man. You would not be here if this land were not conquered and a nation created with certain social foundations. This is another “Jewish” issue which “anti-Semites” raise that has some foundation in fact. The idea that the Jew is viewed as a parasite, rightly or wrongly. The city dweller, the Ghetto dweller, the Jew is not a builder, is not a worker, he trades in baubles and trades in money. The Jew cannot survive where there is no civilization upon which to feed. These are some of the charges leveled at Jews, and I have found it to be true in practical terms. In all my life I’ve met one Jew that actually does a physical job. Some day I will be happy to share some personal stories, from a woman who pulled an insurance fraud to a family friend (yep, Jewish) whose own brother kicked him to the curb because he was married to a Christian woman (my grandmother, who always said the Jews destroyed Europe, helped hide his identity when the Germans were deporting Jews in Prague). He and his wife immigrated here and moved to Chicago where his brother, a jeweler lived. I have to guess that the jeweler was not aware that David’s wife was a “goy” prior to sponsoring them.

      In this quick note I will end by saying this for your benefit Gordon. When George decided to include me, I told him that while we may not agree on everything, and we can discuss just how far back Jewish power has been involved in world politics, i.e. the British Empire and further, we see eye to eye on a great many things. I'll also add that National Socialism is an INDIGENOUS philosophy, it is NOT meant for export, which Hitler stated emphatically in Mein Kampf and which is HELD SACRED by ALL true National Socialists. The GOP is NOT the Right, it is the right hand of the Democratic Party and visa versa. These are the Imperium's parties. Why are anti-war people from "both sides" always considered radical in the media? Because this is an Empire. Your buddy Jeff B, made a point of telling me that he was in the military and that his hand was still steady to shoot (I'm not sure if that was some kind of threat) to which I answered thus: When I was a young lad, I wanted very much to become General Patton, or Erwin Rommel (I am an armor nut), I had intended to go to West Point, then when I was about 14, I looked hard and realized what Vietnam was all about. I did not buy the jingoism and the hollow excuses for destroying a small agricultural country. I did not buy the Gulf of Tonkin crap (recently declassified as having been a lie). I do have a pretty high IQ (152), maybe that went some way towards allowing me to see it where my family could not. I decided against becoming part of the other "evil" empire. I've been railing against this Empire since then, and considered a COMMUNIST by my family because of it. But your buddy, Jeff, apparently did not see it in his youth, and I'd wager that it is through his Judaism that he has found common ground with you in the present. I have been aware most of my life that something is horribly wrong here.

      Nationalists DO believe in the sovereign rights of people in THEIR own lands, we do NOT believe that needless wars should be fought overseas for "fun" or profit. Likewise, we believe that we have a right to protect and secure a homeland for our own children, i.e. the 14 words. We also agree with the things that Gordon listed. 9/11 was bullshit, no doubt pulled off by Mossad with heavy weight elite Jews like Silverstein, et al with the full knowledge and help of rogue Whites like Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, AND Condi Rice and Colin Powell, both of whom are traitors to their own people as well. All should be tried and shot for treason and murder of their own countrymen and the millions of people now dead or suffering because of these phony wars. We Nationalists agree that the government has a place in economic life, particularly in assets like oil. There is an ocean of oil under the Dakotas. Why would the GOP AND the Democrats allow potentially hazardous Gulf drilling when there is enough oil in the middle of this country on dry land to last 200 years? And why shouldn't that natural asset be used by the nation to pay off debt and rebuild US infrastructure. It does not belong to one man. An oil company can be paid handsomely for extracting it, but it is a natural asset that COMES WITH THE PROPERTY. In fact, I support the notion that the Lakota Nation revoke any treaty and reclaim the states involved and THEY can extract the oil to sell back to us. It would be better than allowing Jewish lawyers to con Indians into opening casinos which helps destroy people's lives.

      NS people do NOT agree with Capitalism, like Hitler, again in Mein Kampf. In our estimation, Capitalism is Jewish, part of Imperialism, and the "other hand" of Communism, part of the Hegelian dialectic. There is no worker's paradise, just as trickle down economics really means that most of us are getting pissed on. Obama is a fraud, his leash is held by Rahm Emmanuel. While he bends over backwards for AIPAC and Israel, he is being portrayed as an "anti-Semite", especially among the Christian Zionist community. If there were ever a people that needed a year or two in a re-education camp, it is the 50 million morons that worship Israel instead of Jesus Christ as their faith proclaims. These poor fools are incapable of even seeing through the thin veil of deception and distortion of their own faith. Sadly, they are not the only fools. I have been off the hook on all of these things for years, I get idiotic looks and responses. To Dems I am a "Nazi", to Republicans I am a Communist. I am ALWAYS considered "extreme" by one side or the other. Both sides are controlled by the same Imperial dogma and media lies and can't recognize it.

      So, as I've said before, we have far more in common than not. I think rationality could iron out the 10% which we disagree on, such as the question of who is at the top of the pyramid and the issues of Zionist Christians AND the Jewish Liberalism that always seeks to subvert "indigenous" ideologies. You cannot deny that Judaism is a cult ruled by the Talmud and filtered through the Jewish community even to those self-proclaimed atheists. A last example and I promise to end this email. I did work some time ago for a Jewish fellow, who claimed to be an atheist. He and I agreed that Bush was a criminal, that the war in Iraq was wrong (I'm not sure what he thought of 9/11 and Afghanistan). He was very happy to know me, when we were both atheists (actually I am agnostic, if there is a God or gods, it is not for me to know His mind) and railing against the system and US imperialism. Then, Israel went on another killing spree in Gaza, then Israel went on another killing spree in Lebanon. He was no longer an atheist, he was a Zionist, then it was "those dirty Arabs", then I was informed he was named after Theodor Herzl (must be his middle name as his first name is Norman). My, my, my, how quickly this bird changed his song. Needless to say, my final missive to him was in regards to the last Gaza atrocity, to which he replied that friends don't talk about some things.

      Gentlemen, I believe we are being guided towards a cataclysm. Whatever the New World Order is, Talmudic or otherwise, it has used us and is now working its "creative destruction" on us. I am all for allying with ANY people who understand this and are willing to be honorable about shaping the outcome if we can prevail. That includes some Jews, and REJECTS plenty of Whites who are Imperial Leftists, Imperial Rightists and Judeo-Christians (like my own father).


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:31:51 -0500
Subject: Re: Our correspondence, from first to today
To: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>, David Baillie <editor@nemw.net>

      Thanks very much Gordon for your totally constructive and energetic help. You’ve written, and know about, a lot of history that I never even had a glimpse of, at least until recently. I hope David will think seriously about pursuing the ideological differences that separate us. My hope is that our common efforts to find a possible route out of the current fatal human condition can be disseminated much more widely than just our small circle. But my sense is that very few people take the trouble to read, let alone think about, the stuff I’ve worked on so laboriously these last years. Like you, I don’t think it makes any sense to dismiss Hitler as a crazed madman. A lot of his criticisms of the socio-political system in Austria, Vienna in particular, ring true, and there’s little or no doubt that Jewish influence over the so-called information media was a big factor there, as it clearly is in the U.S. (and even worse in Canada) today. I should read more, as you are finding the time to do, but I keep finding myself driven to publicize the discussions, and that takes me lots of time. I also have to spend a considerable effort taking on many of the ordinary chores that Nancy’s physical health now place beyond her ability. NOTE: at this point David, your long e-mail response just came. Of course I've read it — the first time. Many, many thanks. It, too, ought to get to many more people than just the three of us. David, I appreciate your point that the term Nazi is used in a derogatory way practically always. My intent, in titling my postings “A new Nazi friend, David Baillie - 2,3, . . .” is simply to use the fact that to most of the people who see my stuff it’s a jarring juxtaposition — What the fuck is a “nice Jewish man/boy” doing being friends with a (of course) despicable Nazi. It’s only a promotional gimmick. I suppose I could think of other titles, but is it something for me to bother with? The main thing I’m trying to gain is readership, and engagement in the real struggle to save the earth and all living species. I think that what I write makes it pretty clear where I’m coming from. Sincerely, with best wishes, —George


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:37:44 -0400
Subject: Re: Our correspondence, from first to today
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Thank you Gordon, and thank you, George. To start, I am a mutt: Czech, Ukrainian, Scottish and Native American. You need not tell me about the British Empire, as a Scot I am well aware. Or the Communists, I am well aware of what they really did as well. Some day I will tell you what my grandmother endured with two small children in post-war Prague. Another clarification, I do not call myself a "Nazi", it is NOT what National Socialists call themselves, not even the German ones. It is a derogatory term used by the Allies (to confuse people as to Zionism? Zionism/Nazism, most people are not equipped to handle subtle differences such as this, let alone semantic distortions. Nazi is a pejorative term which as you saw yourself creates a barrier to discussion.

      I never did cry about the “poor White man”. George, you wrote the other day of having an “indigenous” approach. Today I am the “indigenous” man. I AM concerned that the neighborhood I grew up in is now overrun with Brazilian squatters. I grew up in a city of mainly Irish and Italian folks that worked hard and maintained their properties. It is gone. My parents now live on a street where the most well-kept garden two houses up now serves as a parking lot for 5 cars and a boat. As a contractor I recently worked for a Jewish slum lord who owns 6 disgustingly squalid tenement buildings in which she has allowed illegals. They willingly signed a lease saying they would move in with the apartments as is. Then they, en masse, started “playing the system” and stopped paying rent as well as living on the dole. One day the owner and I got to talking and she said that she was “rethinking” her Liberal-mindedness. I think both sides are in the wrong. Her for expecting people to live in filth (walls filled with mildew that are painted over, and they for coming here and living off the rest of us, etc.

      I will add one more wrinkle to that story. Not all of those apartments have squatters. There is a hard working White family in one apartment that have had to pull teeth to get anything fixed, and a gentle old Jewish man (maybe gay, he has never been married) who has lived in his for over 30 years. In all that time, his landlord (the husband of the Jewish woman, he died recently) has never even painted the apartment. Last winter a leak in the ceiling over his pantry got so bad that water poured in and destroyed the pantry. The slum lord sent me to seal the roof (a flat tar and gravel) but the pantry has been left destroyed to this day as far as I know. Mr. Gluck (the elderly Jewish man) has always payed his rent and is AFRAID to complain because she may raise his rent. I pressed him to go to the Board of Health, like the illegals, but given his nature I doubt he has done so. Instead of putting money back into the property, the owners have lived the good life. The son refinanced all of these slum buildings to purchase a country club in Nashua, NH. Below is a picture of one of Mr. Gluck's ceilings, they are all like this:

      As to your other topics. Who is in charge is academic. Is it Jews? There are most certainly Jewish elites involved, those euphemistically referred to as the “bankers” and media controllers. I choose the Nazi symbol instead of the Hammer and Sickle because I do not appreciate the average “good” Jews’ Liberalism either, which is destabilizing my “indigenous” homeland, it does seem to be a problem anywhere Jews get hold politically and socially. You may not see it that way, I do. I think that Jews stick together and are ruled from on high like a cult, their “persecutions” used to flock them like sheep towards the aims of their more rabid Talmudic leaders. In my estimation, this, inadvertently or not, on the part of the average Jew, creates a Fifth Column in the homelands of indigenous peoples. Witness Liz’s rabid anti-White-man ranting. Are White men indigenous anywhere? Don’t we have some rights somewhere, why must we be colonized by outsiders? I was driven from the high tech industry (outsourced or H1B1 here) and when I went back to contracting found that illegals are being paid dirt money by, yes — White contractors — to gobble up all the work they can get, thereby reducing the jobs available for the rest of us. A curse on these White folks as well.

      South Africa and Rhodesia fed much of Africa thanks to the White farmers. Africa as a whole is further in jeopardy because White man gave up his station as the arbiter of civilization and control there. All because Whites did NOT want to mix with blacks? Mandela was imprisoned, not executed by the Whites, while his wife was necklessing her opponents. These two countries became nations because White men made nations of them while many tribes fought each other endlessly. The same is true of the US. I am part Indian, I understand the conquest from both sides, however this is now a unified nation BECAUSE of the White man. You would not be here if this land were not conquered and a nation created with certain social foundations. This is another “Jewish” issue which “anti-Semites” raise that has some foundation in fact. The idea that the Jew is viewed as a parasite, rightly or wrongly. The city dweller, the Ghetto dweller, the Jew is not a builder, is not a worker, he trades in baubles and trades in money. The Jew cannot survive where there is no civilization upon which to feed. These are some of the charges leveled at Jews, and I have found it to be true in practical terms. In all my life I’ve met one Jew that actually does a physical job. Some day I will be happy to share some personal stories, from a woman who pulled an insurance fraud to a family friend (yep, Jewish) whose own brother kicked him to the curb because he was married to a Christian woman (my grandmother, who always said the Jews destroyed Europe, helped hide his identity when the Germans were deporting Jews in Prague). He and his wife immigrated here and moved to Chicago where his brother, a jeweler lived. I have to guess that the jeweler was not aware that David’s wife was a “goy” prior to sponsoring them.

      In this quick note I will end by saying this for your benefit Gordon. When George decided to include me, I told him that while we may not agree on everything, and we can discuss just how far back Jewish power has been involved in world politics, i.e. the British Empire and further, we see eye to eye on a great many things. I’ll also add that National Socialism is an INDIGENOUS philosophy, it is NOT meant for export, which Hitler stated emphatically in Mein Kampf and which is HELD SACRED by ALL true National Socialists. The GOP is NOT the Right, it is the right hand of the Democratic Party and visa versa. These are the Imperium’s parties. Why are anti-war people from “both sides” always considered radical in the media? Because this is an Empire. Your buddy Jeff Blankford, made a point of telling me that he was in the military and that his hand was still steady to shoot (I'm not sure if that was some kind of threat) to which I answered thus: When I was a young lad, I wanted very much to become General Patton, or Erwin Rommel (I am an armor nut), I had intended to go to West Point, then when I was about 14, I looked hard and realized what Vietnam was all about. I did not buy the jingoism and the hollow excuses for destroying a small agricultural country. I did not buy the Gulf of Tonkin crap (recently declassified as having been a lie). I do have a pretty high IQ (152), maybe that went some way towards allowing me to see it where my family could not. I decided against becoming part of the other “evil” empire. I’ve been railing against this Empire since then, and considered a COMMUNIST by my family because of it. But your buddy, Jeff, apparently did not see it in his youth, and I’d wager that it is through his Judaism that he has found common ground with you in the present. I have been aware most of my life that something is horribly wrong here.

      Nationalists DO believe in the sovereign rights of people in THEIR own lands, we do NOT believe that needless wars should be fought overseas for “fun” or profit. Likewise, we believe that we have a right to protect and secure a homeland for our own children, i.e. the 14 words. We also agree with the things that Gordon listed. 9/11 was bullshit, no doubt pulled off by Mossad with heavy weight elite Jews like Silverstein, et al with the full knowledge and help of rogue Whites like Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, AND Condi Rice and Colin Powell, both of whom are traitors to their own people as well. All should be tried and shot for treason and murder of their own countrymen and the millions of people now dead or suffering because of these phony wars. We Nationalists agree that the government has a place in economic life, particularly in assets like oil. There is an ocean of oil under the Dakotas. Why would the GOP AND the Democrats allow potentially hazardous Gulf drilling when there is enough oil in the middle of this country on dry land to last 200 years? And why shouldn't that natural asset be used by the nation to pay off debt and rebuild US infrastructure. It does not belong to one man. An oil company can be paid handsomely for extracting it, but it is a natural asset that COMES WITH THE PROPERTY. In fact, I support the notion that the Lakota Nation revoke any treaty and reclaim the states involved and THEY can extract the oil to sell back to us. It would be better than allowing Jewish lawyers to con Indians into opening casinos which helps destroy people’s lives.

      NS [National Socialist] people do NOT agree with Capitalism, like Hitler, again in Mein Kampf. In our estimation, Capitalism is Jewish, part of Imperialism, and the “other hand” of Communism, part of the Hegelian dialectic. There is no worker’s paradise, just as trickle down economics really means that most of us are getting pissed on. Obama is a fraud, his leash is held by Rahm Emmanuel. While he bends over backwards for AIPAC and Israel, he is being portrayed as an “anti-Semite”, especially among the Christian Zionist community. If there were ever a people that needed a year or two in a re-education camp, it is the 50 million morons that worship Israel instead of Jesus Christ as their faith proclaims. These poor fools are incapable of even seeing through the thin veil of deception and distortion of their own faith. Sadly, they are not the only fools. I have been off the hook on all of these things for years, I get idiotic looks and responses. To Dems I am a “Nazi”, to Republicans I am a Communist. I am ALWAYS considered “extreme” by one side or the other. Both sides are controlled by the same Imperial dogma and media lies and can’t recognize it.

      So, as I’ve said before, we have far more in common than not. I think rationality could iron out the 10% which we disagree on, such as the question of who is at the top of the pyramid and the issues of Zionist Christians AND the Jewish Liberalism that always seeks to subvert “indigenous” ideologies. You cannot deny that Judaism is a cult ruled by the Talmud and filtered through the Jewish community even to those self-proclaimed atheists. A last example and I promise to end this email. I did work some time ago for a Jewish fellow, who claimed to be an atheist. He and I agreed that Bush was a criminal, that the war in Iraq was wrong (I’m not sure what he thought of 9/11 and Afghanistan). He was very happy to know me, when we were both atheists (actually I am agnostic, if there is a God or gods, it is not for me to know His mind) and railing against the system and US imperialism. Then, Israel went on another killing spree in Gaza, then Israel went on another killing spree in Lebanon. He was no longer an atheist, he was a Zionist, then it was “those dirty Arabs”, then I was informed he was named after Theodor Herzl (must be his middle name as his first name is Norman). My, my, my, how quickly this bird changed his song. Needless to say, my final missive to him was in regards to the last Gaza atrocity, to which he replied that friends don’t talk about some things.

      Gentlemen, I believe we are being guided towards a cataclysm. Whatever the New World Order is, Talmudic or otherwise, it has used us and is now working its “creative destruction” on us. I am all for allying with ANY people who understand this and are willing to be honorable about shaping the outcome if we can prevail. That includes some Jews, and REJECTS plenty of Whites who are Imperial Leftists, Imperial Rightists and Judeo-Christians (like my own father).


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:36:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Our correspondence, from first to today
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      And here I was about to hop in the shower. As I said, I understand that your using the term Nazi was for shock value. I look forward to having real discussions with real people. Perhaps not all of the people you currently associate with are open-minded enough to consider a middle path, only their path, and what are the rest of us to do?


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:28:33 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net&n362;
Subject: The Führer to the German People: 22 June 1941, pertaining to the invasion of the USSR, well worth the read

      Keep in mind that today Europe is under the control of the EU while England retains its sovereignty and the Pound, so this will give you a little perspective on the “Allies” and their intentions before Germany’s struggle to remain independent ... there are some spots where the translation is rough and words are misspelled. For instance, “the Duce” is il Duce, or Mussolini.

===========================
The Führer to the German People: 22 June 1941
German people! National Socialists! After long months when I was forced to keep silent, despite heavy concerns, the time has come when I can finally speak openly. When the German Reich received England’s declaration of war on 3 September 1939, the British attempted once again to frustrate any attempt to begin a consolidation, and thus a strengthening, of Europe by fighting the then strongest power on the Continent. England formerly destroyed Spain through many wars. For the same reason, it waged its wars against Holland. With the help of all of Europe, it later fought France. And around the turn of the century, it began to encircle the German Reich, and it began the World War in 1914.

      Germany was defeated in 1918 only because of its inner disunity. The results were terrible. After first hypocritically declaring to be fighting only against the Kaiser and his regime, they began the systematic destruction of the German Reich after the Germany army had laid down its arms. As the prophecy of a French statesman, who had said that there were twenty million Germans too many, began to be fulfilled through starvation, disease, or emigration, the National Socialist movement started building the unity of the German people, thereby preparing the rebirth of the Reich. This new revival of our people from poverty, misery, and shameful contempt was a sign of a pure internal rebirth. England was not affected, much less threatened, by this. Nonetheless, it immediately renewed its hateful policy of encirclement against Germany. Both at home and abroad, we faced the plot we all know about between Jews and democrats, Bolshevists and reactionaries, all with the same goal: to prevent the establishment of a new people’s state, to plunge the Reich again into impotence and misery.

      The hatred of this international world conspiracy was directed not only against us, but also against those peoples who also had been neglected by Fortune, who could earn their daily bread only through the hardest struggle. Italy and Japan above all, alongside Germany, were almost forbidden to enjoy their share of the wealth of the world. The alliance between these nations was therefore only an act of self-defense against a threatening, egotistical world coalition of wealth and power. As early as 1936, according to the testimony of the American General Wood to a committee of the American House of Representatives, Churchill had said that Germany was becoming too strong again, and that it therefore had to be destroyed. In summer 1939, England thought that the time had come to renew its attempts to destroy Germany by a policy of encirclement. Their method was to begin a campaign of lies. They declared that Germany threatened other peoples. They then provided an English guarantee of support and assistance, next, as in the World War, let them march against Germany. Thus between May and August 1939, England succeeded in spreading the claim throughout the world that Germany directly threatened Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Bessarabia, and even the Ukraine. Some of these nations allowed themselves to be misled, accepting the promises of support that were offered, and thereby joined the new attempt to encircle Germany.

      Under these circumstances, I believed that I was called by my conscience, and by the history of the German people, to assure not only these nations and their governments that these British accusations were untrue, but also to reassure the strongest power in the East through formal declarations that our interests did not conflict.

National Socialists!
      You probably all felt that this was a bitter and difficult step for me. The German people have never had hostile feelings toward the peoples of Russia. During the last two decades, however, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have attempted to set not only Germany, but all of Europe, aflame. Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist worldview to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule. They have attempted this not only intellectually, but above all through military means. The results of their efforts, in every nation, were only chaos, misery, and starvation.

      I, on the other hand, have tried for two decades to build a new socialist order in Germany, with a minimum of interference and without harming our productive capacity. This has not only eliminated unemployment, but also the profits of labor have flow increasingly to working people. The results of our policies are unique in all the world. Our economic and social reorganization has led to the systematic elimination of social and class barriers, with the goal of a true people’s community. It was, therefore, difficult for me in August 1939 to send my minister to Moscow to attempt to work against Britain’s plans to encircle Germany. I did it only because of my sense of responsibility to the German people, above all in the hope of reaching a lasting understanding and perhaps avoiding the sacrifice that would otherwise be demanded of us. With the exception of Lithuania, Germany declared that those areas and nations were outside Germany’s political interests. There was a special provision in the case that England succeeded in inciting Poland into war against Germany. But here, too, German claims were moderate, and in no relation to the accomplishments of German arms.

National Socialists!
      The results of the treaty, which I sought in the interests of the German people, were particularly severe for Germans living in the affected nations. Over half a million German people’s comrades — all of them small farmers, craftsmen, and workers — were forced, almost overnight, to leave their former homes to escape a new government that threatened them with vast misery, and sooner or later, with complete extermination (Ausrottung). Even so, thousands of Germans disappeared! It was impossible to learn what had happened to them, or even where they were. More than 160 of them were men holding German citizenship. I kept silent about all this, because I had to keep silent! My wish was for final agreement with this state, and if possible a lasting settlement. But even during our march into Poland, in violation of the treaty, the Soviet rulers suddenly claimed Lithuania. The German Reich never intended to occupy Lithuania, and never made any such demand on Lithuania. To the contrary, it turned down the request by the Lithuanian government to send German troops there, since that did not correspond to the goals of German policy. Nonetheless, I accepted this new Russian demand. But that was only the beginning of ever new demands.

      The victory on Poland, gained exclusively by German troops, gave me the occasion to extend a new offer of peace to the Western powers. It was rejected by the international and Jewish warmongers. The reason was that England still hoped to mobilize a European coalition against Germany that would include the Balkans and Soviet Russia. Those in London decided to send Ambassador Cripps to Moscow. He has clear orders to improve relations between England and Soviet Russia, and to develop them along lines England wanted. The English press reported on the progress of his mission, as long as they were not silent for tactical reasons. The first results were evident in fall 1939 and spring 1940. Russia justified its attempts to subject not only Finland, but also the Baltic states, by the sudden false and absurd claim that it was protecting them from a foreign threat, or that it was acting to prevent that threat. Only Germany could have been meant. No other power could enter the Baltic Sea, or wage war there. I still had to remain silent. The rulers of the Kremlin continued.

      Consistent with the so-called friendship treaty, Germany removed its troops far from its eastern border in spring 1940. Russian forces were already moving in, and in numbers that could only be seen as a clear threat to Germany. According to a statement by Molotov, there were already 22 Russian divisions in the Baltic states in spring 1940. Although the Russian government always claimed that the troops were there at the request of the people who lived there, their purpose could only be seen as a demonstration aimed at Germany. As our soldiers attacked French-British forces in the west, the extent of the Russian advance on our eastern front grew ever more threatening. In August 1940, I concluded that, given the increasing number of powerful Bolshevist divisions, it was no longer in the interests of the Reich to leave the eastern provinces, so often devastated by war, unprotected. This, however, is exactly what the British and Soviets had hoped. The fact that so much of the German forces, in particular the air force, was tied down in the east made it impossible for the German leadership to bring a radical end to the war in the West. This was the goal of both British and Soviet Russian policy. Both England and Soviet Russia wanted to prolong this war as long as possible in order to weaken all of Europe and plunge it into ever greater impotence. Russia’s threatened attack on Rumania was intended not only to take over an important element in the economic life not only of Germany, but of Europe as whole, or at least to destroy it.

      With boundless patience, the German Reich attempted after 1933 to win over the southeastern European states as trading partners. We, therefore, had the greatest possible interest in their domestic stability and order. Russia’s entrance into Rumania and Greece’s ties to England threatened to rapidly transform this area into a general battleground. Despite our principles and customs, and despite the fact that the Rumanian government had brought on these troubles itself, I urgently advised them, for the sake of peace, to bow to Soviet extortion and cede Bessarabia. The Rumanian government, however, believed that it could justify this step to its own people only if Germany and Italy in return guaranteed the security of its remaining territory. I did this with a heavy heart. When the German government gives a guarantee, it will stand by it. We are neither English nor Jewish. I thus believed that I had saved peace at the last moment, even if at the cost of a heavy obligation. To reach a final resolution of these problems and to clarify Russian intentions toward the Reich, as well as under the pressure of steadily increasing mobilization along our eastern border, I invited Mr. Molotov to come to Berlin. The Soviet foreign minister demanded further clarification from Germany on the following four questions:

    Molotov’s first question:
Does Germany’s guarantee for Rumania in the event of an attack mean war with Russia in the event of an attack Soviet Russia?
    My answer:
The German guarantee is broad and obligates us absolutely. Russia has never told us that it has any interest in Rumania outside Bessarabia. The occupation of northern Bukowina was already a violation of this assurance. I therefore do not believe that Russia could have any further claims on Rumania.

    Molotov’s second question:
Russia feels itself threatened by Finland again. Russia is unwilling to tolerate this. Is Germany ready to provide no support for Finland, and above all to withdraw the German troops in Kirkenes?
    My answer:
As in the past, Germany has no political interests in Finland. However, the German government cannot accept a new Russian war against the tiny Finnish people, particularly since we could never believe that Finland threatens Russia. However, we do not want war in the Baltic Sea.

    Molotov’s third question:
Is Germany willing for Soviet Russia to provide a guarantee to Bulgaria, and to send Soviet-Russian troops to Bulgaria for this purpose — although he (Molotov) wished to say that they did not have the intention of removing the king.
    My answer:
Bulgaria is a sovereign state, and I did not know that, just as Rumania had asked for a German guarantee, Bulgaria has asked for one from Soviet Russia. I would also have to discuss the matter with my allies.

    Molotov’s fourth question:
Soviet Russia absolutely requires free passage through the Dardanelle, and also demands, for its protection, several important positions on the Dardanelle or along the Bosporus. Is Germany willing to agree to this or not?
    My answer:
Germany is ready at any time to agree to changes in the Statute of Montreux that benefit the Black Sea states. Germany is not willing to approve Russian bases on the straights.

National Socialists!
      I behaved as the responsible leader of the German Reich, but also as a responsible representative of European culture and civilization. The result was an increase in Soviet Russian activity against the Reich, above all the immediate beginning of efforts to subvert the new Rumanian state and an attempt to use propaganda to eliminate the Bulgarian government. With the help of confused and immature people, the Rumanian Legion succeeded in organizing a coup that removed General Antonescu and plunged the nation into chaos. By removing legal authority, they also removed the grounds for Germany to act on its guarantee. Still, I believed it best to remain silent. Immediately after this enterprise collapsed, there was a new increase in Russian troops along the German eastern border. Increasing numbers of tank and parachute divisions threatened the German border. The German army, and the German homeland, know that until a few weeks ago, there was not a single German tank or motorized division on our eastern border.

      If anyone needed final proof of the carefully hidden coalition between England and Soviet Russia, the conflict in Yugoslavia provided it. While I was making a last attempt to keep peace in the Balkans, and in agreement with the Duce invited Yugoslavia to join the Three Power Pact, England and Soviet Russia organized a coup that toppled the government that was ready for such an agreement. The German people can now be told that the Serbian coup against Germany was under both the English and Soviet Russian flags. Since we were silent, the Soviet Russian government went a step further. Not only did they organize a Putsch, but signed a treaty of friendship with their new lackeys a few days later that was intended to strengthen Serbia’s resistance to peace in the Balkans, and turn it against Germany. It was no platonic effort, either. Moscow demanded that the Serbian army mobilize. Since I believed that it was better not to speak, the rulers of the Kremlin took a further step. The German government now possesses documents that prove that, to bring Serbia into the battle, Russia promised to provide it with weapons, airplanes, ammunition, and other war material through Salonika. That happened at almost the same moment that I was giving the Japanese Foreign Minister Dr. Matsuoka the advice to maintain good relations with Russia, in the hope of maintaining peace.

      Only the rapid breakthrough of our incomparable divisions into Skopje and the capture of Salonika prevented the realization of this Soviet Russian-Anglo-Saxon plot. Serbian air force officers, however, fled to Russia and were immediately welcomed as allies. Only the victory of the Axis powers in the Balkans frustrated the plan of involving Germany in battle in the southeast for months, allowing the Soviet Russian armies to complete their march and increase their readiness for action. Together with England, and with the hoped for American supplies, they would have been ready to strangle and defeat the German Reich and Italy. Thus Moscow not only broke our treaty of friendship, but betrayed it! They did all this while the powers in the Kremlin, to the very last minute, hypocritically attempted to favor peace and friendship, just has they had with Finland or Rumania. I was forced by circumstances to keep silent in the past. Now the moment has come when further silence would be not only be a sin, but a crime against the German people, against all Europe.

      Today, about 160 Russian divisions stand at our border. There have been steady border violations for weeks, and not only on our border, but in the far north, and also in Rumania. Russian pilots make a habit of ignoring the border, perhaps to show us that they already feel as if they are in control. During the night of 17-18 June, Russian patrols again crossed the German border and could only be repelled after a long battle. Now the hour has come when it is necessary to respond to his plot by Jewish-Anglo-Saxon warmongers and the Jewish rulers of Moscow’s Bolshevist headquarters.

German people!
      At this moment, an attack unprecedented in the history of the world in its extent and size has begun. With Finnish comrades, the victors of Narvik stand by the Arctic Sea. German divisions, under the command of the conqueror of Norway, together with the heroes of Finland’s freedom and their marshal, defend Finnish soil. On the Eastern Front, German formations extend from East Prussia to the Carpathians. From the banks of the Pruth River, from the lower Danube to the Black Sea, German and Romanian soldiers are united under state leader Antonescu. The purpose of this front is no longer the protection of the individual nations, but rather the safety of Europe, and therefore the salvation of everyone. I have therefore decided today once again to put the fate of Germany and the future of the German Reich and our people in the hands of our soldiers. May God help us in this battle.
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>

      Dear David, You are not, by any stretch of the imagination, indigenous to America — any more than the Brazilian immigrants you rail against. In fact probably less so, because the Brazilians probably have a fair bit of native American blood. The word indigenous has a very specific meaning in the science of ethnography, so let us be very clear. Frankly I find your use of this word contemptible because it is actually an inversion of the truth — which means precisely “societies endemic to their original territories, that developed prior to exposure to WESTERN culture.” Go to Wikipedia entry for “indigenous” for a brief introduction. You owe yourself at least that much.

      Now as for your other comments, I do see that we have common ground. You obviously have figured out that the people of this society are getting a raw deal (“trickle down means pissed on”), etc. That part of it you have figured out correctly. We live in a time when the elites have reversed any and all hard-won gains that the ordinary people have made over the centuries. We are back in the Middle Ages and Feudalism, where a tiny majority owns everything and uses the ordinary folk like draft animals, nothing more. But for someone with your purported intelligence level, you have made some huge errors in your analysis — and are misdirecting your energies in direction that is a complete waste. Why? Go have a look at these words from Eugene Debs, more than 100 years ago. He is writing in response to a fellow much like yourself, who rails against blacks and the danger they pose to the white working man.

      http://www.marxists.org/archive/debs/works/1904/negronemesis.htm : In the first place you don’t get equality for the Negro —: you haven’t got it yourself. In the present social scale there is no difference between you and the Negro — you are on the same level in the labor market, and the capitalist whose agent buys your labor power doesn’t know and doesn’t care if you are white or black, for he deals with you simply as labor power, and is uninterested save as to the quality and quantity you can supply. He cares no more about the color of your hide than does Armour about that of the steers he buys in the cattle market. Foolish and vain indeed is the workingman who makes the color of his skin the stepping-stone to his imaginary superiority. The trouble is with his head, and if he can get that right he will find that what ails him is not superiority but inferiority, and that he, as well as the Negro he despises, is the victim of wage-slavery, which robs him of what he produces and keeps both him and the Negro tied down to the dead level of ignorance and degradation.

      The most striking fact about these words is how true they are today, more than 100 years after they were written. Nothing has changed. The wedge of racism has been a diabolically clever tool of the elite to keep ALL ordinary people down. Do yourself a favor and go read the whole thing, including the letter from the racist that inspired Debs’: response. Today it is not the capitalist who owns the factory, but the Wall Street Baron who owns you as a debt slave. At the same time, he and his fellow Robber Barons have created an economy that is a house of cards ready to collapse and take all of us down. At the end of your missive you state that a “cataclysm” is coming. That is dead on my friend and few people actually recognize this.

      But that cataclysm is being set in motion by the perfumed princes of Wall Street, not the dirty poor from the slums of Brazil or Addis Ababba who show up on these shores looking for crumbs. You seem pre-occupied about these poor slum-dwellers who are “working” the system. Yes, some of them are. But do yourself a favor and inform yourself of some real numbers. Again to to wikipedia and look at a breakdown of government spending: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government
_spending
Welfare spending amounts to about $400 billion (2006 figures), about 3 percent of GDP. That is less than defense, which in the same year was half again as much (over $600 billion) and growing every year. But the really interesting part is the category right behind welfare, INTEREST — paid to the Wall Street Rober Barons. It comes to over $300 billion.

      Now here is my question. Why does this not bother you? (Or anyone else among the nationalists or socialists or whatever you choose to call yourselves). Why on earth should the people’s government be having to pay interest to banks anyway? Shouldn’t the creation of money rest with a sovereign state anyway? What this tells us is that our government is NOT sovereign. It is “paying tribute” to a higher authority, just as vassals and conquered nations have always paid tribute to those that ruled them. Now you have also made some observations about Jews and the kind of work they seem to choose. I will give you the benefit of my non-scientific observations too. I have noted that Greeks and Macedonians never do anything else than work in the restaurant trade. I have traveled to many parts of the world and wherever I go into a restaurant, chances are it is owned by Greeks, (they probably have the food concession in Antarctica too).

      SO WHAT? Jews like to work with gold and jewellery. So what? And anyway these observations amount to nothing because they are random and unscientific sampling. I grew up in a heavily Jewish neighborhood and a lot of my Jewish friends from high school ended up in menial jobs. You just have not been exposed to the full spectrum of Jewish society. George, you have harped too about how Jews all become professionals. This may have been true in your generation, but not in mine. Out of all my classmates, most of whom were Jewish, I was practically alone in going on to University (at least among the males). In my generation it was the South and East Asians who all went on to University and professions.

      Anyway my point is that these kinds of observations are pointless because they are so unscientific. Now since everybody is making these, I will make mine too. Most Ukrainians, Czechs and central Europeans I have known have had an anti-Semitic streak a mile wide. Scots are the most racist and bigoted people I have come across. One of my buddies in high school was from a Scot family. I used to cringe at the conversation at his house. His father came to Canada as an immigrant after the war, but he felt a sense of entitlement like he owned the place — British empire and all that crap ... Of course being a good bigoted wasp, he was given a cushy job in the civil service, while immigrants of “lesser” races had to toil as dishwashers or ditch diggers. Am I being unfair yet? Regards, —Gordon.


Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: One More Point

      I mentioned that the government gives the banks in interest almost as much as it gives to the poor on welfare. Now both are handouts. The only differences are moral and ethical. The banks split that $300 billion among a handful of super-rich money-changers by way of huge multi-million dollar bonuses. Not only do they not deserve to get one penny, but they deserve to be swinging from light-poles on Wall Street, which is what Uncle Joe would do if he were around today.

      That $400 billion handed out on welfare is divided among millions of poor and desperate people. Even if each and every one of them were working the system, I would still rather they get the money than the robber barons that have me and everyone else by the throat. The reality is that only a small fraction are working the system. There are genuinely a lot of people who are unable to support themselves in our society. The handouts they get are enough for a life of bare subsistence, if that. Squalor and misery is more like it. Regards, —Gordon.


Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:45:52 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      Gordon I don’t think you are being unfair, I think you are being bipolar. :-) I also think you are a closet Capitalist, indeed Communism and Capitalism share a great deal, the fundamental idea that man is an economic unit and not a spiritual creature. I was just wrapping up with the following paragraph, but I’ve decided I’ve done enough typing this morning so I’ve moved the following to the front and the end of the email will have to trail off unfinished . . .

      If these illegals want a better life, let them have their revolutions against their own elites in their own countries. I don’t care if they call themselves Communists, or Fascists, or Catholics or Martians. Let them create social justice and a sustainable order in their own land. We shall do so here. Do not see that you actually participate in the Capitalist game by considering people mere ECONOMIC UNITS that can be shuffled willy nilly around the globe? It ultimately deprives them of their heritage (over time they will lose it to pop culture, one, two, maybe three generations) and their roots. THIS is why Nationalists DESPISE Communist ideology. You WANT Babylon, we don’t, we want to keep our heritage, we want to keep our races (yep, even them) intact, we don’t believe people are mere economic units, we are NOT Capitalists, nor are we Communists. We don’t believe life is all about economics. We accept that life is struggle . . .

      Now back to the regularly scheduled email, I have a family reunion to go to so I can’t tap away here all day. :-(
      Point by point: On being “indigenous”. Why yes I am, first off I was BORN here. Secondly, even if the whiteness of my skin offends you (I think YOU are the racist) I am part American Indian, Blackfoot to be specific. My very off the boat Scottish grandfather married a Native in Canada of all places. How “racist” and WASP of him. They had 8 children. I suspect that I am more indigenous than you. Furthermore, Europeans were here BEFORE the Asians and that has been proven by the Clovis points among other things. I am partial to the observation that there is RAIN wear on the Sphinx as well. I believe that it was built when the Sahara was a jungle. Another problem I find with your analysis is this constant referral to Wikipedia. Indigenous means no exposure to Western culture? That is the definition? So Whites aren’t indigenous ANYWHERE? How about we change that to prior to JUDAISM and CHRISTIANITY? Europe wasn’t Christianized (i.e. exposed to monotheism by way of ancient Jewish gobbledygook) entirely until 1100AD or thereabouts. Why can’t indigenous mean THAT?!!?? The races are the races regardless of any intellectual processes involved. But let’s refer back to the Bible for a moment, particularly the Tower of Babyl. Even in this ancient writing that people of the Earth were at one time brought to one empire and God got pissed and scattered them. There is a reason Biblical or not that we are distinct races. What’s wrong with that?

      The history of man is a lot older than we are “allowed” to believe. And I think you would agree that the early Christians who destroyed the Library at Alexandria were well aware that they were destroying science and history. Very convenient when you want to keep people enthralled by superstitions like Genesis and a God who would expect you to kill your own son. That is just CRAZY. The story of Lot is crazy. All of the Old Testament stories are full of crazy people and absurd fantasies. And yet they are God’s chosen and heroes. Go figure.

      Next up. You keep claiming I am a “racist”. I am not a racist, I had a black girlfriend, have you? I do, after all is said and done, believe in separation of the races. Humans over the millennia congregated into enclaves where they have developed at their own pace, with their own race and are distinct species unto themselves. I’d like to see that maintained. If you care so much about a stink bug in the Andes, then I think keeping Whites around is equally valid. I do NOT think allowing everyone to cross breed into a mindless brown mass of serfs is a bright future. You rail against the system and yet the system is pushing for more and more inter-racial mixing. WHY? Why is the US an “experiment”? Why do we here allow ourselves to be raised in pop culture greenhouses. Do you have no suspicions that this too is part of the “bad guys” master plan? I do. NS [National Socialist] people do.

      I brought up the story about the illegals and the slum lord because it presents not just the issue of illegal immigration, but the slum lord as well who until recently managed to collect rents from people on the bottom of the economic ladder as the properties they accepted living in are falling around their ears. Funny you should rant only about the illegals. But, let’s address that. Illegals come from somewhere for crumbs here, correct? Crumbs that WE provide yes? I through taxation AND from loss of work to these people, yes? Is THAT fair? Furthermore, what about where they were BORN? Don’t they have crumbs upon which to feats there? If not, why not? Perhaps the revolution should be in their own backyard first. Why should I who was born here and at least partially indigenous by your reckoning have a right to some quality of life, no? I work as a contractor these days, check to check, nothing in the bank, nothing to retire on. Why are YOU so determined to destroy what little I have?

      You go on to rail against those “bankers” who forever remain hidden behind the term banker. Well what is banking? Usuary. Where does it come from? Jews. I am well aware, as are ANY nationalists, that the FRB [Federal Reserve Bank] is robbing us blind by loaning our government money at interest. We are well aware of who the “perfumed princes” are and where they are. Hitler told the world that in Mein Kampf, still rings true today (in your words). NS was against International Finance and stock market manipulation as much as Hitler was against Communism, WHICH he was against as much for its slaughter of tens of millions of Ukrainians and Russians as for the fool hardy notion of egalitarianism. By the way, you don’t seem overly concerned about Uncle Joe’s participation in slaughtering the rural farmer folk, who are the backbone of ANY civilization. Reminds me of Cain and Able. Cain was a shepherd, no doubt fucking his sheep, and Able the farmer. You Jews historically seem to like killing those who make food grow while embracing the sheep fuckers!!!! :-)

      I just got your last email Gordon. Talk about unscientific. You rant and rave about one set of toothless hillbillies (on Welfare no less!!!! Is there something WRONG with the Welfare system Gordon?) and say that they are endemic to the whole White race!!!! I think YOU are a racist, and what is even funnier is that you no doubt have white skin!!!! I feel for you regardless. If a hillbilly ran down one of my dogs, I would be mad as hell. If they hit another one I would shoot the tires out on their car as a warning. If they killed anything else that was mine, I’d probably shoot one of them. As for the deer, Gordon, I hate to say it but we all gotta go sometime. Deer is food, you should be happy that they didn’t let the meat go to waste. Not sure gutting it next to the stream was the best idea but nature has a way of cleaning up such messes.

      I had the smartest dog in the world, she could literally hold her breath underwater. I threw a rock in Lake Winnepasawkee on vacation and told her to watch the ducks bobbing their heads in the water to see if she would get the rock. She kept looking at them and putting her face in the water until she figured out she had to stop breathing. Once she learned to hold her breath she loved “snorkeling”, holding her breath as long as she could manage and look around at all the stuff under the water. She was fascinated by this foreign world, whether I threw rocks or not. On the same trip she dove off the boat after me when I went out to try and water ski. It was a hoot trying to get her butt back in the boat. She was the best friend I ever had, bar none, no human has ever come close. She looked like a Dobie but was half the size because she was part Beagle as well. When I talked to her her little eyebrows would go up and down like a human. She died of cancer prematurely at about 8 years of age. If there is a God I hate him for taking her from me so young. I'm sorry for the stupid side story, I don’t remember why I brought it up now. EXCEPT that I hate that life is finite, especially when it comes to Nikki, the best friend I ever had.

      Gordon, answer a question for me please. You and Liz think that everything is White man’s fault right? Africans have never built anything noteworthy have they? Any skyscrapers? Any rocket ships? Any lasting social orders? White folks have. White folks have poured billions, if not trillions, into feeding Africans (unless all that money went into someone’s pockets of course) yet it is never enough. What is wrong with nature? We Whites have come to accept this “nuclear family, zero population growth” crap, but not in your precious Brazil, not Africa. Their people are over-populating and moving into our areas. It is the White man’s medicine and meddling in those stupid colonial experiments that have raised life expectancy and lowered infant mortality among the Third Worlders, is that not a benefit in your eyes? Was it not White South Africa that fed most of Africa while the savages were spearing each other and raping each other on a massive scale? Today even Liberals admit that AIDS is so prevalent in Africa AND Brazil because these people don’t seem to have ANYTHING ELSE to do except fuck each other and whatever else they can get their hands on. This might be fine for animals with little expectation of surviving infancy or living beyond 40, but it is not a very useful way of life in a modern scientific world is it? These illegals here in Somerville at the slumlord’s property are raising children in apartments that literally have mildew and mold growing inside the walls. Are YOU happy about that? I’m not, I am as CONCERNED for them as I am ABOUT them. This system you seem to think is so wonderful to let them come here also forces them to live in filth, and THAT is why I originally brought up that story. That Jewish bitch that rents to them could care less that her Liberalism put in HER property that should be fucking condemned!!!! She is now concerned with her Liberalist views because not only are they cheating me (a goy, who works for a living and has to pay for everything from what I can manage to earn from jobs I can manage to land), but now she is being fucked by these “thankless” illegals who have come to realize that they are living in a shithole. Her shithole. Her boat has been repossessed, they aren’t paying rents, the board of health is on her ass, her son refinanced all the properties to buy a country club, etc etc etc, ad nauseum.

      All of humanity was subject to the laws of nature for hundreds of thousands of years. Nature’s laws, God’s laws. My sister was born with a congenital heart defect and died when she was three. My mother to this day can’t mention her name without crying, my life was shaped by an overly sensitive and protective woman as a result. Yet, this is nature. My parents did everything they could to prolong her life. A year after she died, 1968, doctors perfected the surgery necessary to seal the heart properly. I was too young to remember much of her and how often she may have had discomfort, yet I am sure that she did. Who was better served, my parents clinging to hope or my sister kept alive and no doubt sometimes suffering? Reminds me of the Terry Schiavo case, my parents took her parents’ side in the case, naturally. These people allowed their own daughter to live a destroyed body and brain for 14 years. Imagine if you will that Terry’s mind actually functioned as do yours and mine for that whole time, and only her motor skills and communication abilities were broken. Can you imagine the 14 years of hell you would experience? And this was to serve the selfishness of the parents who refused to accept that their daughter’s time had come, in this case because the poor girl was obsessed about weight loss. Even more shocking to me was that Conservatives, especially Christians, had a problem with allowing the girl to finally die in peace. If one believes in God, then one must accept the afterlife and eternal reward for the innocent. What was THEIR problem with allowing the girl to go to God? So you see, people are not rational when they reject nature.


Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:54:24 -0400
From: David Baillie (Editor) <editor@nemw.net>

      P.S. I’ve been calling this a feudal system for decades. You are preaching to the choir.


Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com>

      David, I see that you are not really interested in seriously considering anything I have said. That’s fine, to each his own. But strangely, I have found some common ground with you in regard to animals. I know George will disagree with this, but I’m not too enamored of people in general. Regardless of race or religion or age or whatever, most are just jerks. I much prefer animals. I have 26 cats here, all of which I have either rescued, or taken in because they were abandoned. I have paid to get each and every one neutered and treated for any maladies over the years, including expensive surgeries. I don’t even want to guess what my bills are, just glad that I can provide for them.

      I also volunteer in the community rescuing animals and doing spay-neuter as a public service, with the help of the local government which I have persuaded to participate and provide funds. I know exactly what you have experienced. I lost too many loved ones like your little mutt and cursed the heavens for it. Still do. George thinks I love life, but actually I think life on this rotten little coil of ours is a lousy joke. Someone must be having a good cosmic laugh. I value certain things much more than life itself — integrity, dignity, generosity, knowledge. I am here and I will conduct myself with dignity no matter what, but I will not cling to this lousy life when my time comes. Nature is vast and awesome, but it is not really beautiful. Living here on the land you become intimate with life as it really is. It is incredibly hard and merciless for each and every living thing (except people). So hard sometimes that it breaks my heart. Again and again.

      I could tell you so many stories, but just one for now. A couple of years ago I spotted a baby coon taking a nap in the hayloft. The sun was shining through an opening and he was lying on his back like a little baby, dreaming, his little paws clawing at something in his dream. I let him alone and figured his mother must be nearby. A couple of days later I was on the tractor and I saw him again, all by himself, out behind the barn this time and digging for something in the ground. Again I wondered where his mother was because you usually don’t see a baby this small by himself. I made a mental note to myself to put a bit of cat kibble down for the little fellow. The next time I saw him he was a lifeless little rag doll, right behind the barn where he always was. He had starved to death. My instincts were right and he was left motherless. I could have saved the little guy but I never bothered to follow through because I was “too busy.” When I picked him up and examined him closely I was amazed by the soft texture of his skin and the resemblance of his little hands to human hands. Raccoons have hands much like ours and can grasp just like we do. They are incredible little creatures. The one that comes every night to the back porch asking for cat kibble, his eyes light up when he sees me through the glass door . . . Sometimes they kill my chicks, so I have to trap them in a live cage and relocate them. I buried that little guy, along with several kittens that had died. I have buried many, many little furry friends like that.

      Anyway, I am glad we got to exchange stories. I have learned that even with people that you might want to “write off” as it were, you can surprisingly find common bond. Regards, —Gordon.


[I’ll close this posting with some of my comments. If the exchange continues,
which at the moment seems questionable, I’ll probably begin another
posting, “A new 'Nazi' friend, David Baillie - 4” —G.S.]

      I’ll start these comments, which focus mainly on the intense interchange between Gordon Arnaut <goarnaut@yahoo.com> and David Baillie <editor@nemw.net> with a statement of my own current position regarding the joint U.S.-Israel colonial imperial campaign to eradicate Palestine.
      The entire project to take the land of Palestine for a Jewish state was illegitimate from the start. This project is at the core of Zionism. Being “nice” to the Palestinians, as I’m certain many good and decent (but misguided) Jewish people favor, simply is not a cure for the cancer of conquest. The same for all conquests — of the Americas by Europeans and so on. The northern European/American project to retake the Ottoman Empire needs to be scrapped, completely given up. Jewish would-be conquerors of Palestine should be forced to leave and live elsewhere. Conquest is ALWAYS wrong, immoral, unethical and must be rejected. Great Britain was, throughout its imperial dominance, a leading curse of humanity, whose criminal history leaves a terrible legacy. Our task ought to be to clean it up as soon as possible. And of course the other European powers should leave Africa, probably the most despoiled population group in the world. What world-class monsters we so-called Whites have been, imposing “our” anti-civilization on the world.

      With my basic stance on this conflict clear, this is the context in which my comments should be understood. On one point we are in solid agreement — the earth is being rapidly destroyed as a hospitable habitat. That is beyond question. I would go further to say that each of us loves life, at least a good deal of it. This in spite of Gordon stating “George thinks I love life, but actually I think life on this rotten little coil of ours is a lousy joke. Someone must be having a good cosmic laugh.” And in spite of David saying, “I had the smartest dog in the world . . . She [Nikki] died of cancer prematurely at about 8 years of age . . . the best friend I ever had . . . I hate that life is finite . . . If a hillbilly ran down one of my dogs, I would be mad as hell. If they hit another one I would shoot the tires out on their car as a warning. If they killed anything else that was mine, I’d probably shoot one of them.”

      I think it’s clear that David is very quick — he dashed off lengthy e-mails with evident ease. But his speed wasn’t matched with careful discretion. For example, in his letter datelined Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:37:44 -0400 he says, “when I was about 14, I looked hard and realized what Vietnam was all about. I did not buy the jingoism and the hollow excuses for destroying a small agricultural country. I did not buy the Gulf of Tonkin crap (recently declassified as having been a lie). I do have a pretty high IQ (152)”. Good for a 14-year-old! To line up against the destruction of Vietnam in spite of all the pro-war anti-Communist propaganda in which Americans were being inundated and to characterize (correctly) Vietnam as “a small agricultural country” was right on target. That contrasts with his silly boast “I do have a pretty high IQ (152)”. If he had given it a moment’s thought he would not have tossed in this spurious “evidence” of his IQ score to show how “smart” he is. The real evidence is in what he writes. And of course he must know that the so-called “scientific measurement” of an “Intelligence Quotient” is just so much bullshit, promoted not so many years ago by “that Harvard Jew professor of psychology” Richard Herrnstein.[2]

     


[These comments are not yet completed.]

NOTES

[1] David Baillie correspondence. The exchange instigated by David is essentially in three posts of mine:
1st http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-07-02.htm
2nd http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-07-14.htm
3rd http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/t/2010-07-19.htm
I think I’ve managed to include most of the important parts, but if more material comes to mind I’ll add it. And make corrections as folks call errors and/or omissions to my attention.

[2] Richard Herrnstein and I.Q. The idea that the so-called Intelligence Quotient is inherited was (and still is) part of the ruling class ideology. The physicist William Shockley, who with his colleagues at the Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey John Bardeen and Walter Brattain invented the transistor, shared with them the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics. Shockley believed that people, like the resistors used in electrical circuits, were color coded by their skin color in accord with their “inherent”capabilities. Arthur Jensen, Prof of (Educational) Psychology at the Univ of California, Berkeley, is known for his contributions in the field of “Heritability of IQ, Race and Intelligence” according to the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen. Both non-Jews Shockley and Jensen advocated their racist views prior to Jew Herrnstein’s publication of his notorious article in The Atlantic Monthly in 1971.
      In a 1971 interview in The New York Times, [Herrnstein] predicted that an inborn lack of ability would bar those of low I.Q. from career success, creating a “biological stratification” into castes based on “hereditary meritocracy.” Herrnstein expanded his views into a 1973 book, I.Q. and Meritocracy, which ignited arguments over the uses of I.Q. testing. Herrnstein drew heavily on the data of Dr. Arthur Jensen, a psychologist at the University of California at Berkeley, who held that differences between the races in I.Q. were the result of heredity rather than factors like education or economic status. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/
09/16/obituaries/richard-herrnstein-64-dies-backed-nature-over-nurture.html

      The Chicago Tribune obituary article on Richard Herrnstein, at http://articles
.chicagotribune.com/1994-09-18/news/9409180230_1_iq-mr-herrnstein-arth
ur-jensen
stated, “Herrnstein first set off debate on IQ, race and class in 1971 when he published an article in The Atlantic Monthly contending intelligence is largely inherited [which] would bar those of low IQ from career success.” [He] expanded his views into a 1973 book, IQ and Meritocracy, which ignited arguments over the uses of IQ testing. He drew heavily on the data of Arthur Jensen, a psychologist at the University of California at Berkeley, who held that differences between the races in IQ were the result of heredity rather than factors like education or economic status. In an article in The Atlantic Monthly in 1982, Mr. Herrnstein asserted not only that IQ was inherited but that, because this was so, compensatory education was futile. A 1985 book, Crime and Human Nature, which [he] wrote with James Q. Wilson, a political scientist now at the University of Southern California, held that a propensity toward crime had biological roots, which were inherited.


George Salzman is a former American Jew living in Oaxaca, Mexico, an Emeritus Prof of Physics, Univ of Massachusetts-Boston.
All comments and criticisms are welcome.  <georgeisalzman@yahoo.com>

      If you know folks who want to ‘save the world’, starting with global open communication — no censorship, I’ll be glad to add them to my Notes of an anarchist physicist listserv [noaap]. To subscribe write me, including your first and last names, please, or send a blank e-mail to noaap-subscribe@lists.riseup.net.

*     *     *
Return to the latest postings page of website II,
      at http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/s/01.htm
Return to the home page of website II,
      at http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/s/00.htm

Initial posting of this page: 19 July 2010.
Last update: 3 January 2011